header-logo header-logo

16 June 2017 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Behind closed doors

nlj_7750_parpworth

Are we in constitutional chaos pending Brexit negotiations? Neil Parpworth consults The Cabinet Manual for advice

The result of the 8 June 2017 general election came as a surprise to many. Few predicted that a hung Parliament would be the outcome although when the polls closed at 10 o’clock on election night, the Exit Poll produced jointly by the BBC, ITV and Sky accurately forecast that the Conservative Party would gain the most seats but with no outright majority. As it turned out, Theresa May’s party (at times during the election campaign it felt that this was the new name for the Conservatives) fell eight seats short of the 326 required for a majority.

What next?

The relative novelty of a UK hung Parliament has ensured that it is not widely known what should happen following an inconclusive general election result. In the absence of a codified constitution, it is necessary for us to turn to constitutional convention or, as Dicey termed them, the ‘understandings, habits or practices which, though they may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll