header-logo header-logo

Being reasonable

09 August 2007 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7285 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , EU , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

So far as is reasonably practicable: are employers about to face a tougher test? Brent McDonald reports

In Commission v UK: C-127/05 [2007] All ER (D) 126 (Jun) the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rejected an attempt by the Commission to declare the use of “so far as is reasonably practicable” (SFAIRP) clauses in health and safety regulations incompatible with Directive 89/391/EEC, commonly known as the Framework Directive.

The ECJ decided that the Commission had failed to put forward a sufficiently clear and evidence-based argument to justify this step. However, the matter may not end there thanks to Advocate General Mengozzi’s opinion to the court. Although the opinion supported the dismissal of the Commission’s case, it states that SFAIRP clauses which allow employers a defence based on more than technical infeasibility are contrary to the purpose of the Framework Directive, and hence incompatible.

If that is correct, unless SFAIRP clauses are applied differently by the courts in future, litigants may be forced to rely directly on regulations as against emanations of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll