header-logo header-logo

27 September 2023
Issue: 8042 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bereavement Index shows legal professionals want more tech, faster responses & better communications

The vast majority (94%) of legal professionals think their firm could handle probate and estate administration more efficiently, according to the annual Bereavement Index, by Glasgow-based bereavement technology firm Exizent

This figure is 42% more than in 2022. More than a quarter (26%) of these professionals’ also report that their firm is currently under resourced and struggling with the workload, and a further 39% state that staff retention and recruitment is a strain.

However, lawyers are not the only ones struggling to improve their processes. The slow response of financial institutions causes substantial overall delays to the process. This may improve in future, as more than half of financial services professionals said their company has plans to improve their bereavement processes.

The Bereavement Index, now in its third year, researches the processes involved in bereavement in the UK as experienced by consumers, legal services firms and financial institutions. It uncovered a number of distressing facts about the probate and estate administration process after death.

More than half of grieving individuals report the process of administering a deceased’s estate substantially impacted their mental wellbeing, and nearly all (94%) found at least part of the process stressful. 18% report finding it extremely stressful.

Solutions to this may include dedicated technology, better communication and standardising processes.

When asked what would improve the service they offer, legal services professionals ranked better communications with financial institutions (53%) and executors (46%), faster responses from HMCTS/HMRC (49%), and a dedicated software solution (45%) as some of the top solutions. For the third year in a row, they rated technology as their number one investment priority—perhaps partly because only 26% reported using dedicated specialist software.

Nick Cousins, co-founder and CEO of Exizent, said: ‘Following the loss of a loved one, the last thing individuals need is a lengthy estate administration process that causes them additional stress including both mentally and financially.

‘The good news is that I know from conversations with financial services companies over the last year that many are planning to improve their processes associated with a customer’s death—and our research backs this up. The benefits of doing so are now recognised in meeting regulatory obligations, improving operational efficiency, and importantly because it is the right thing to do.’

Read the full Bereavement Index here

Issue: 8042 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll