header-logo header-logo

Bevan Brittan—Melanie Carter

22 September 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Public and regulatory law expert joins Bevan Brittan as partner

Expanding national law firm Bevan Brittan has announced its second senior hire so far in 2022 with the recruitment of a leading national practitioner in public & regulatory law.

Melanie Carter, a Band 1 leader in public & regulatory law, joins from Bates Wells, bringing more than 25 years of experience advising public sector organisations and businesses to Bevan Brittan’s highly-regarded Public & Administrative Law team. She is also ranked in the directories for information law (in particular Freedom of Information), professional regulation, local government and elections.

Melanie’s experience is exceptionally broad, acting for a range of public bodies in the governmental field, leading nationally on the audit of local government (with its focus on finance, standards and corporate governance), professional regulators, corporate businesses, political parties and national charities and drafting legislation both domestically and internationally.   

She has a particular expertise in judicial review and inquiries and investigations having acted on the Independent Child Sexual Abuse, Grenfell, Infected Blood and the Brook House Inquiries.  She is the founder of the Public Law Solicitors’ Association, an international independent adjudicator and Tribunal Judge (Information Rights). 

Based in London, but operating across all of Bevan Brittan’s four offices, Melanie adds her experience to the firm’s already well-established clients for central and local government, non-departmental public bodies, financial services, education and health and other bodies of a hybrid nature with public functions. 

Duncan Weir, managing partner, said: 'This is yet another excellent senior appointment for our business and I am delighted to welcome Melanie to Bevan Brittan. She is adding vast experience to our existing skillset within our teams and will be able to work across a range of issues and support our clients in both our established and emerging markets, where we continue to see significant growth.

'Melanie’s appointment, along with other partner recruits who have joined before her, shows the calibre of well-established and highly respected solicitors we are attracting to our business. This is not just down to the work we do but how we do it, in a flexible and collaborative way which appeals to both our colleagues and our clients.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll