header-logo header-logo

BHP held liable for Fundão dam disaster

Australia-headquartered mining giant BHP has been held strictly liable as ‘polluters’ for the Fundão dam disaster in Brazil, in one of the largest group actions ever brought in the English courts

More than 600,000 claimants brought the case, Município de Mariana v BHP Group [2025] EWHC 3001 (TCC), handed down last week. The 2015 dam collapse and flow of liquified iron ore tailings killed 19 people and caused widespread devastation.

Ben Wolfe, partner at Grosvenor Law, said the decision was ‘a stark reminder that parent companies and investors can be found liable in England for events and environmental failures that occur on overseas projects—even where assets are operated through joint ventures and local subsidiaries.

‘The court’s findings on foreseeability and duties of oversight significantly expand the potential exposure of large multinational groups.’

Lucy Blake, partner at Jenner & Block, said: ‘Companies are increasingly under pressure to take responsibility, not just for their own operations but also for third parties in respect of human rights and environmental harms.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll