header-logo header-logo

BHP held liable for Fundão dam disaster

Australia-headquartered mining giant BHP has been held strictly liable as ‘polluters’ for the Fundão dam disaster in Brazil, in one of the largest group actions ever brought in the English courts

More than 600,000 claimants brought the case, Município de Mariana v BHP Group [2025] EWHC 3001 (TCC), handed down last week. The 2015 dam collapse and flow of liquified iron ore tailings killed 19 people and caused widespread devastation.

Ben Wolfe, partner at Grosvenor Law, said the decision was ‘a stark reminder that parent companies and investors can be found liable in England for events and environmental failures that occur on overseas projects—even where assets are operated through joint ventures and local subsidiaries.

‘The court’s findings on foreseeability and duties of oversight significantly expand the potential exposure of large multinational groups.’

Lucy Blake, partner at Jenner & Block, said: ‘Companies are increasingly under pressure to take responsibility, not just for their own operations but also for third parties in respect of human rights and environmental harms.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll