header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Bias revisited

Post Redcar, councillors have a broader remit to behave politically, says Nicholas Dobson

The swirling eddies and currents of bias in local authority decisions (which have lured many an unwary municipal mariner to their doom) have finally been brought into some calm confluence by the Court of Appeal. For on 1 July 2008 the court overturned the decision by Mr Justice Jackson on 20 December 2007 to quash a politically sensitive decision of Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council taken during the 2007 “elections purdah” period, ie that between the notice of election and the election itself (see Persimmon Homes Teeside Limited v. R (Kevin Paul Lewis) [2008] EWCA Civ 746).

The claim had been brought by Kevin Paul Lewis and Persimmon appealed against the decision of the Divisional Court. While the council had been represented at first instance (and had opposed the application to quash) it was not part of the Court of Appeal proceedings.

In the process, the court on a close analysis of the evidence came to different conclusions from those of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll