header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Bid for another chance

Legal aid firms are to be given a second chance to bid for civil contracts.

The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) has announced it will launch further opportunities to tender for 2018 face-to-face work by the end of June. It said it was thinking particularly about organisations that did not submit a tender or failed to submit compliant tenders. Contracts will be available for: family; housing, debt and welfare benefits; immigration and asylum; mental health; community care; claims against public authorities; clinical negligence; public law; and family mediation.

The LAA said it had ‘identified a number of organisations which wish to deliver civil legal aid but failed to submit compliant tenders in the category of law or procurement area in which they wish to deliver work’. Consequently, it wanted to give organisations a ‘further opportunity’.

For further comment on the tendering process for legal aid services, see 'Out of order' by Steve Hynes of the Legal Action Group.

Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll