header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Bid for another chance

Legal aid firms are to be given a second chance to bid for civil contracts.

The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) has announced it will launch further opportunities to tender for 2018 face-to-face work by the end of June. It said it was thinking particularly about organisations that did not submit a tender or failed to submit compliant tenders. Contracts will be available for: family; housing, debt and welfare benefits; immigration and asylum; mental health; community care; claims against public authorities; clinical negligence; public law; and family mediation.

The LAA said it had ‘identified a number of organisations which wish to deliver civil legal aid but failed to submit compliant tenders in the category of law or procurement area in which they wish to deliver work’. Consequently, it wanted to give organisations a ‘further opportunity’.

For further comment on the tendering process for legal aid services, see 'Out of order' by Steve Hynes of the Legal Action Group.

Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll