header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Out of order

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
03 May 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7791_hynes

Steve Hynes takes time out to explain the complexities of the tendering process for legal advice telephone services

It appears that the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) is having problems finding enough firms willing to take on civil legal aid work. It has been forced to re-advertise a number of tenders recently, including the telephone service in discrimination law. There is a suspicion that it is trying to fix the process for this as it is not prepared to pay the market price for it.

Ring the changes

As part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) changes, the government introduced a telephone service for some areas of law. Members of the public wanting advice on debt, discrimination, and education cases under the legal aid scheme have to use the service. It is a bureaucratic process, as getting help requires people to first contact an operator who carries out a means, merits and scope test to determine if they qualify for legal aid. If they do, they are then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll