header-logo header-logo

Out of order

03 May 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7791_hynes

Steve Hynes takes time out to explain the complexities of the tendering process for legal advice telephone services

It appears that the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) is having problems finding enough firms willing to take on civil legal aid work. It has been forced to re-advertise a number of tenders recently, including the telephone service in discrimination law. There is a suspicion that it is trying to fix the process for this as it is not prepared to pay the market price for it.

Ring the changes

As part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) changes, the government introduced a telephone service for some areas of law. Members of the public wanting advice on debt, discrimination, and education cases under the legal aid scheme have to use the service. It is a bureaucratic process, as getting help requires people to first contact an operator who carries out a means, merits and scope test to determine if they qualify for legal aid. If they do, they are then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll