header-logo header-logo

06 June 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bindmans LLP—Tanya Goldfarb

Senior hire boosts business immigration practice

Tanya Goldfarb, a senior consultant solicitor, has joined Bindmans LLP to lead the expansion of its business immigration law practice. Tanya is a highly regarded immigration law specialist, who brings with her over 25 years of experience in UK immigration and nationality law, as well as significant business immigration expertise that spans all corporate and private client matters.

Tanya is instructed by multinationals, start-ups, and SMEs, and is entrusted to advise on the prevention of illegal working, risk management strategies and sponsorship. Tanya advises clients across a range of sectors, and is experienced in assisting with points-based system applications, Global Talent Visa applications, and right to work compliance. She also assists clients with complex matters where high level strategic planning is needed. With substantial experience and interest in the creative sector, Tanya acts for a wide spectrum of clients in this industry, from individuals to production companies, and is sought after for her innovative and practical approach.

Joint Heads of our Immigration, Asylum and Nationality team, Liz Barratt and Alison Stanley, commented: "We are delighted to have Tanya join our team. She is a highly respected and experienced lawyer with expertise that will greatly strengthen our business immigration practice. As a result, we look forward to further assisting clients with legal needs in this area. Tanya’s skills, paired with her innovative approach to her work and dedication to providing the best possible service to clients make her the perfect fit for Bindmans, and we are pleased to have attracted such talent to the firm."

Tanya Goldfarb commented: "I am thrilled to be joining Bindmans LLP and leading the expansion of the firm’s business immigration practice. The Bindmans Immigration team already has a reputation for excellence, alongside a hugely varied practice and diverse client base that I look forward to building on in years to come."

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll