header-logo header-logo

20 January 2021
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Birkett Long—new office

Firm opens Malta office

Essex law firm, Birkett Long, has opened a new office in Malta, ensuring its clients continue to be in the best position following Brexit. In particular, intellectual property clients will benefit from the firm’s international reach.

With its European presence, Birkett Long can help companies overcome issues they may have with post-Brexit trading.

The office in Malta means the firm has a European footprint and will be able to perpetuate its rights of audience in front of the EU IPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office) for European trademark and design matters, now that the UK has left the EU.

Jonathan Perlmutter, head of the firm’s intellectual property (IP) team, said: ‘From an IP perspective, the opening consolidates our position as a provider of intellectual property rights all across the world, by maintaining the ability to represent clients in the European forum, which many firms will have lost as a result of the Brexit settlement.’

In addition, Birkett Long has invested in the recruitment of Dr Rachel Genovese, a Maltese IP specialist who will work closely with our European clients to develop the firm’s profile as a provider of legal and IP services.

Jonathan Perlmutter said: ‘I am delighted to announce the opening of this new office. We are really pleased with the rapid, COVID-defying growth of the intellectual property offering at Birkett Long, which has recently seen us undertaking work for leading car manufacturers, technology and infrastructure giants and the US government, as well as companies of all sizes across the county and the country.

‘We are very pleased to be able to offer such a sophisticated and multi-faceted service to our local clients, having established the department based on the insight that Essex provides a corridor between London and mainland Europe and is one of the entrepreneurial and industrial heartlands of the country. This is a situation which is sure to subsist far, far into the future, and it is to the enduring success of which we strive daily to contribute.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll