header-logo header-logo

24 November 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Family team expands with double appointment in Bristol office

Birketts has expanded its presence in Bristol with the appointment of two highly experienced family law specialists— partner Will MacFarlane and senior associate Sarah Dodds—marking the launch of its new family team in the city. The hires further strengthen the firm’s growing national family law practice.

With 17 years of post-qualification experience, Will MacFarlane advises high net worth and ultra-high net worth clients on both domestic and international family matters. His practice focuses on complex financial claims, cohabitation issues and nuptial agreements. He is ranked in the Chambers and Partners Ultra High Net Worth category and recommended in both the Spear’s Family Lawyer Index and The Legal 500.

Senior associate Sarah Dodds brings over a decade of experience advising on all aspects of relationship breakdown, with particular expertise in complex and high-conflict child arrangements. A trained collaborative solicitor, she is also recognised in the Spear’s Family Lawyer Index and has a strong interest in legal issues around modern families and family creation.

Commenting on the appointments, Katie Beaven, partner and head of the family team, said the firm was ‘thrilled to welcome Will and Sarah to launch our family team in Bristol’. She added that their ‘elite experience and commitment to growing their practice in the south west make them outstanding additions’. Will MacFarlane said he was ‘excited to return to the city where I trained nearly twenty years ago’, while Sarah Dodds said Birketts’ ‘collaborative culture really stood out’ and that she was ‘looking forward to working with the growing team in Bristol’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll