header-logo header-logo

05 February 2016 / Jonathan Pickworth
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

​A blessing or a curse?

nlj_7685_pickworth

DPAs: who would want one—and what are the alternatives, asks Jonathan Pickworth

On 30 November 2015, Sir Brian Leveson approved a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) between the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and ICBC Standard Bank (Standard Bank). It is the first DPA in the UK and in some quarters it is believed likely to be the first of many. Indeed, the SFO tell us that there are several other potential DPAs in the pipeline. The second, which the SFO anticipated by the end of last year, has thus far failed to materialise. However, the more important question remains, who would want one anyway?

The stars in alignment

Much has already been written about the technical aspects of this first DPA. Certainly it appears that the stars were in alignment for this one. This was a case of an isolated bribe, in Tanzania, that was quickly identified and immediately reported both to the National Crime Agency and to the SFO. The self-report was made in 2013, and Standard Bank was later acquired by new owners.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll