header-logo header-logo

05 February 2016 / Jonathan Pickworth
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

​A blessing or a curse?

nlj_7685_pickworth

DPAs: who would want one—and what are the alternatives, asks Jonathan Pickworth

On 30 November 2015, Sir Brian Leveson approved a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) between the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and ICBC Standard Bank (Standard Bank). It is the first DPA in the UK and in some quarters it is believed likely to be the first of many. Indeed, the SFO tell us that there are several other potential DPAs in the pipeline. The second, which the SFO anticipated by the end of last year, has thus far failed to materialise. However, the more important question remains, who would want one anyway?

The stars in alignment

Much has already been written about the technical aspects of this first DPA. Certainly it appears that the stars were in alignment for this one. This was a case of an isolated bribe, in Tanzania, that was quickly identified and immediately reported both to the National Crime Agency and to the SFO. The self-report was made in 2013, and Standard Bank was later acquired by new owners.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll