header-logo header-logo

27 April 2016
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Boiler-room fraudsters

Two men who perpetrated one of the largest boiler-room shares fraud schemes ever pursued by a UK authority have been ordered to pay £11m in compensation.

Judge Gledhill QC, in Southwark Crown Court, told Jeffrey Revell-Reade, 51, to pay £10,751,000 and Anthony May, 60, to pay £250,000. The pair sold shares in US-listed companies from Madrid, but when investors came to sell the shares they found they were worthless, placed in shell companies or in companies not operating. Both men must pay up within three months or go to prison: ten years for Revell-Reade and three years for May.

Their convictions were linked to seven other individuals, also convicted and sentenced following a seven year investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).

In June 2014, Revell-Reade was sentenced to a further eight years and six months in prison. May was sentenced to seven years and four months.

Mark Thompson, head of the SFO’s proceeds of crime division, says: “These individuals benefited substantially from their crimes. Their lavish lifestyles featured numerous overseas properties, wine collections and a luxury yacht. We welcome these orders which the pair now need to pay or face a further period of imprisonment.”

Joanna Dimmock, white collar defence specialist and senior associate at White & Case, says: “Following the recent Libor acquittals, the confiscation sums in this case may indicate much needed success for the SFO. However, on closer analysis, the sums agreed, in fact, suggest significant success for the defence.

“The SFO had been seeking to recover £43m from Revell-Reade. This would have been the biggest order it had ever obtained in such a case. The burden was on the defence to satisfy the SFO that their client did not have the hidden assets they claimed he possessed. This was a substantial hurdle that Revell-Reade's legal team were clearly able to meet and a much lower figure of £10.75m was ultimately agreed.”

Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll