header-logo header-logo

27 April 2016
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Boiler-room fraudsters

Two men who perpetrated one of the largest boiler-room shares fraud schemes ever pursued by a UK authority have been ordered to pay £11m in compensation.

Judge Gledhill QC, in Southwark Crown Court, told Jeffrey Revell-Reade, 51, to pay £10,751,000 and Anthony May, 60, to pay £250,000. The pair sold shares in US-listed companies from Madrid, but when investors came to sell the shares they found they were worthless, placed in shell companies or in companies not operating. Both men must pay up within three months or go to prison: ten years for Revell-Reade and three years for May.

Their convictions were linked to seven other individuals, also convicted and sentenced following a seven year investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).

In June 2014, Revell-Reade was sentenced to a further eight years and six months in prison. May was sentenced to seven years and four months.

Mark Thompson, head of the SFO’s proceeds of crime division, says: “These individuals benefited substantially from their crimes. Their lavish lifestyles featured numerous overseas properties, wine collections and a luxury yacht. We welcome these orders which the pair now need to pay or face a further period of imprisonment.”

Joanna Dimmock, white collar defence specialist and senior associate at White & Case, says: “Following the recent Libor acquittals, the confiscation sums in this case may indicate much needed success for the SFO. However, on closer analysis, the sums agreed, in fact, suggest significant success for the defence.

“The SFO had been seeking to recover £43m from Revell-Reade. This would have been the biggest order it had ever obtained in such a case. The burden was on the defence to satisfy the SFO that their client did not have the hidden assets they claimed he possessed. This was a substantial hurdle that Revell-Reade's legal team were clearly able to meet and a much lower figure of £10.75m was ultimately agreed.”

Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll