header-logo header-logo

29 March 2024 / Lucy Blake
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Opinion , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Bold beginnings at the SFO

166027
Does Nick Ephgrave’s appointment herald a new era for the Serious Fraud Office? Lucy Blake predicts the beleaguered SFO may be about to change tack

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has endured considerable flack in recent years following several high-profile collapsed prosecutions and closed investigations. The decision not to renew Lisa Osofsky’s tenure but instead appoint Nick Ephgrave, a former police officer, as the organisation’s new director (the first non-lawyer to hold the SFO’s directorship in its 35-year history) was interpreted by many as an indication of a change in direction for the agency.

An early clue as to Ephgrave’s strategy and priorities for the coming five years came in February, when he gave his first public speech since replacing Osofsky in August 2023. After several months in the job, Ephgrave has had plenty of time to look under the bonnet and take stock of the SFO’s problems and how they might be fixed. His speech, and indeed many of his actions since joining, suggests he won’t be sitting on his hands.

Past

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll