header-logo header-logo

15 September 2011 / David Burrows
Issue: 7481 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Book review: Family Procedure Rules 2010—a guide to the new law

For reasons which remain unclear the Ministry of Justice rushed in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 in such a way that back-up practice directions and forms were coming off the legislative press as the rules came into operation.

Family Procedure Rules 2010—a guide to the new law
Author: Stephen Parker
Publisher: Law Society Publishing, May 2011
ISBN: 9781907698149
Price: £49.95

Judges and Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) staff had minimal training; and commentators were scrambling to offer help to practitioners and lay people alike.

Stephen Parker and the Law Society are to be congratulated for producing a guide so relatively quickly. On economic and environmental grounds they can be criticised for charging for text of only 104 pages with 500 pages of source material which is readily obtainable on the internet; and the book has no tables or index.

Substantial parts of the text are little more than a summary of the rules. Commentary, which is what the reader needs, is thin; and that commentary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll