header-logo header-logo

Book review: The Last Law Lords and the Supreme Court

14 February 2014
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
web_bookreview

"The book mines this rich vein extremely effectively, wherever relevant assessing what has changed both over the past 40 years since Paterson’s earlier book"

Author: Alan Paterson
Publisher: Hart

ISBN: 9781849463836
Price: £25.00

Professor Alan Paterson’s new book Final Judgment—The Last Law Lords and the Supreme Court is an admirably researched, readable and fascinating addition to the growing literature on how judges go about their work. His theme is judicial decision-making as a social process based on the different “dialogues” in which the judges engage.

The dialogues range from the traditional (with counsel), to the novel (with judicial assistants), from the near (the Court of Appeal) to the far (other supreme courts), from the theoretical (with academics) to the practical (the law reporters), from the open (with Parliament) to the forbidden (with government). Some, such as that with precedents may be with the dead. Some are more symbolic than real, eg with Parliament or the Executive. Some are with the future, eg a dissent.

Rich vein

Paterson subjects each of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll