header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 January 2022 / David Greene
Issue: 7964 / Categories: Features , Profession , International justice
printer mail-detail

Book review: The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
"The message of Breyer is that the Supreme Court, like democracy, relies on consensus and a recognition from all institutions of faithfulness to that consensus"

Author: Stephen Breyer

Publisher: Harvard University Press

ISBN: 978067426936

RRP: £15.95

Stephen Breyer is an Associate US Supreme Court Justice. His short book The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics is the product of his lecture that should have been given at the Scalia Lecture 2021 but the pandemic intervened. And a super little book it is dealing with the relationship between the Supreme Court and the executive; highly apposite here and in the US.

Why generally (but not always) do people and governments accept a court decision as conclusive without significant protest? Cicero wrote of the nature of acquiescence and obedience to state power arising from three factors—punishment, rewards and belief that the state is a just one. Breyer’s thesis is that the Supreme Court relies on the latter in its dealings with government.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll