header-logo header-logo

29 January 2014
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Boris in bus-ad ban storm

Questions over Mayor’s link to TfL’s ban of controversial bus advert

The Court of Appeal has ordered the High Court to investigate whether the Mayor of London intervened to pull controversial gay-“cure” bus adverts.

The proposed adverts, by Christian charity The Core Issues Trust read “Not Gay! Ex-Gay, Post-Gay and Proud, Get Over It”, and were intended as a response to the Stonewall bus adverts, “Some people are gay. Get over it!”

The charity, which supports those who want to “cure” their homosexuality, accused Mayor Boris Johnson of intervening in the decision for political reasons, which would make the decision unlawful. Johnson was due to speak at a hustings organised by gay rights group Stonewall on the day the adverts were blocked. The High Court upheld the ban.

However, Lord Dyson, in the Court of Appeal, pointed to new evidence of an e-mail which “unequivocally” states the Mayor had “instructed” Transport for London (TfL) to ban the advert, and shows the Mayor’s aides immediately contacted The Guardian newspaper. TfL said it had taken the decision to ban the adverts, regardless.

Lord Dyson, giving his decision in R (Core Issues Trust) v TfL [2014] EWCA Civ 34, said: “This is a very unsatisfactory state of affairs.”

However, he said TfL were entitled to ban the adverts. “The restrictions are justified in view of the prominence of the advertisements and the fact that they would be seen by, and cause offence to, large numbers of the public in central London,” he said.

“Moreover, for those who are gay, the advertisements would be liable to interfere with the right to respect for their private life under Art 8(1).”

He said that to allow the adverts would “involve a breach of [TfL’s] duty to have due regard to the s 149(1) [of the Equality Act] considerations and encourage homophobia and put homosexuals at risk”.

 

Issue: 7592 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
Artificial intelligence, proportionality and public decision-making are under increasing judicial scrutiny, according to the latest public law round-up from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Families relying on informal agreements over property ownership could face costly consequences if disputes arise, the High Court has warned
back-to-top-scroll