header-logo header-logo

21 June 2007 / David Burrows
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

A brave new world?

The Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill will increase child support troubles, predicts David Burrows

The Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill hit the bookstands earlier this month—the “other payments” are in respect of mesothelioma, which bears no immediate relationship to child support. The Bill proposes the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (C-MEC) to do the job which the Child Support Agency (CSA) failed to do, and sets out extensive intended amendments to Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991). The already derided CSA 1991, with the separate proposed legislation as well, will be doubled in length. And doubtless the excessively cumbersome regulations will be proportionately extended to cover the new provisions in the Bill. Previous efforts at this legislation have gone through Parliament more or less unopposed; and so too, I suspect, will this. Not at all a propitious start…

A SEMANTIC EXERCISE

The reforming proposals, apart from enforcement, are light. First comes a semantic change with administrative undertones: out goes the CSA—it never had a statutory existence: everything in CSA 1991

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll