header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Breathe easy

The Court of Appeal’s decision in Ware restores stability to the law on bias, says Nicholas Dobson

The Court of Appeal brought tidings of great joy to monitoring officers across the land in a judgment delivered on 18 December 2007. The “Bah Humbug” decision of Mr Justice Collins on 30 March 2007 was finally laid to rest on appeal in R (Ware) v Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council [2007] EWCA Civ 1359, [2007] All ER (D) 266 (Dec).

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Collins J had quashed a council decision to grant planning and hazardous substances consents for the development by National Grid of a natural gas pressure reduction station ([2007] EWHC 913 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 525 (Mar).

This was after members decided to leave a material meeting following advice from the deputy monitoring officer that the members would have to state what was said at a previous meeting with objecting residents (among others) if there were a complaint to the local ombudsman.

 

PREDETERMINATION

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll