header-logo header-logo

03 October 2019 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Brexit—a constitutional crisis?

8710
Simon Parsons looks at the prorogation decision & the constitutional role of the courts

There are three options in respect of Brexit. First, a soft Brexit with the UK remaining connected to the EU economic arrangements but out of the political arrangements. Second, a hard Brexit with the UK out of the economic arrangements and political arrangements but with a withdrawal agreement including a transitional period of remaining in the EU followed by a Canada-style free trade agreement. There would also have to be some arrangement that does the same job as the Irish backstop but which is acceptable to the Tories and DUP. The third option is crashing out of the EU without a withdrawal agreement, so the UK would be out the economic and political arrangements and would leave on the exit day without a transition period and then trade on WTO terms. There would be no backstop and so the Good Friday Agreement could be at risk. Alternatively, the UK could unilaterally revoke Brexit by operation of Art 50 of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll