header-logo header-logo

The Brexit effect

01 June 2018 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Human rights
printer mail-detail
nlj_7795_parsons

​Simon Parsons considers the future of human rights after Brexit

There are three current sources of human rights in the UK, the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), the Charter of Fundamental Rights (the Charter) and the common law. How will these three sources be affected by Brexit?

The Convention will be unaffected by Brexit because it is administered by the Council of Europe which is separate from the EU. There is also the European Court of Human Rights which decides whether the Convention has been breached. Before 2 October 2000 decisions of the Strasbourg court were only persuasive in UK domestic courts but the Convention was and remains binding on the UK in international law. If UK law is found in breach of the Convention the government is under an obligation under Article 46 to put things right. But politics can get in the way: consider the dragging of feet by consecutive governments after Hirst v UK (No 2) [2005] ECHR 681 where Strasbourg ruled a blanket ban on British prisoners exercising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll