header-logo header-logo

The Brexit effect

01 June 2018 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Human rights
printer mail-detail
nlj_7795_parsons

​Simon Parsons considers the future of human rights after Brexit

There are three current sources of human rights in the UK, the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), the Charter of Fundamental Rights (the Charter) and the common law. How will these three sources be affected by Brexit?

The Convention will be unaffected by Brexit because it is administered by the Council of Europe which is separate from the EU. There is also the European Court of Human Rights which decides whether the Convention has been breached. Before 2 October 2000 decisions of the Strasbourg court were only persuasive in UK domestic courts but the Convention was and remains binding on the UK in international law. If UK law is found in breach of the Convention the government is under an obligation under Article 46 to put things right. But politics can get in the way: consider the dragging of feet by consecutive governments after Hirst v UK (No 2) [2005] ECHR 681 where Strasbourg ruled a blanket ban on British prisoners exercising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll