header-logo header-logo

01 June 2018 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The Brexit effect

nlj_7795_parsons

​Simon Parsons considers the future of human rights after Brexit

There are three current sources of human rights in the UK, the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), the Charter of Fundamental Rights (the Charter) and the common law. How will these three sources be affected by Brexit?

The Convention will be unaffected by Brexit because it is administered by the Council of Europe which is separate from the EU. There is also the European Court of Human Rights which decides whether the Convention has been breached. Before 2 October 2000 decisions of the Strasbourg court were only persuasive in UK domestic courts but the Convention was and remains binding on the UK in international law. If UK law is found in breach of the Convention the government is under an obligation under Article 46 to put things right. But politics can get in the way: consider the dragging of feet by consecutive governments after Hirst v UK (No 2) [2005] ECHR 681 where Strasbourg ruled a blanket ban on British prisoners exercising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll