header-logo header-logo

20 September 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7809 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Employment
printer mail-detail

Brexit: no deal no alarm?

nlj_7809_pigott

Deal or no deal, government promises Brexit won’t affect workplace rights: Charles Pigott examines the evidence

  • Assurances have been offered that a no deal Brexit will have no impact in the UK in relation to workplace rights.
  • This matches the commitment to ‘non-regression of labour standards’ in the Chequers white paper.

It seems that UK workplace rights will be at least one area of national life that won’t be disrupted by Brexit—or so the government has assured us in a guidance note published last month. This note is one of 25 separate notes published on 23 August 2018 as part of the government’s preparations for a no-deal Brexit. Another large batch was published on 13 September and more are promised.

The workplace rights guidance note

The scene is set in an overall guidance note which explains the government’s preparations for a no-deal Brexit in the context of the negotiations on a withdrawal agreement with the EU. As the government puts it: ‘People and businesses should not be alarmed by “no deal” planning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll