header-logo header-logo

15 January 2016 / Mark Burns
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bridging the gap

nlj_7682_burns

By offering increased transparency in costs & services, comparison sites can benefit firms & potential clients, as Mark Burns explains

There can’t have been many of us that were surprised by the findings of a recent survey by Citizens Advice which claimed that almost 70% of respondents said they couldn’t afford legal services (see Responsive justice: How citizens experience the justice system, November 2015). The survey responses also highlighted the need for more transparency in a profession which has long been surrounded in mystery. The real question relating to the cost of legal advice has to be around whether clients can see value in the service that they receive and if that service meets their needs. What service does a client actually need, what do they want it to include and how much does that service cost?

Price is a complex area—particularly when it comes to procuring legal services where buying decisions should not be made by creating a race to the bottom—but instead, the profession has to take steps to bring client and lawyer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll