header-logo header-logo

14 January 2016
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Briggs Review backs online court

Litigants bringing claims up to £25,000 could access court without lawyers

The Briggs Review has recommended setting up an online court for claims up to £25,000, which litigants could access without lawyers.

In his interim report of the Civil Courts Structure Review, published this week, Lord Justice Briggs identifies “a clear and pressing need” for an online court, which would give litigants effective access to justice “without having to incur the disproportionate cost of using lawyers.

The online court would process cases in three stages: first, a largely automated, interactive process to identify the issues and provide documentary evidence; second, conciliation and case management by case officers; and third, resolution by judges. On screen, telephone, face-to-face and video meetings would be held to discuss each case.

The case officers would take over some of the judge’s more routine tasks, but parties would have a right to have these decisions reconsidered by a judge.

Briggs LJ is consulting on the basic details of the process. Practitioners are asked for their views on whether the online court should be a branch of the county court governed by the Civil Procedure Rules or entirely separate, what types of claims should be included, the appeal process, and whether the losing side should pay the other side’s costs.

Written responses must be submitted before the end of February.

As for the existing civil courts, Briggs LJ says it is a priority to put in place the structure and software for all the re-organised courts as soon as possible, provide extra training and staff for judges, and ease the burden on the Court of Appeal.

He wants a stronger concentration of civil expertise among the circuit judges and district judges, and for all civil work with a regional connection to be tried in the regions, regardless of value.

Welcoming the interim report, Lord Thomas, the Lord Chief Justice, said: “The time is ripe for reform, and it is in any event essential and unavoidable.”

Briggs LJ began his review of civil court structures and judicial processes last July, will publish a fuller consultation by the end of May, and will complete his review by the end of July 2016.

Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll