header-logo header-logo

Broadcast news

20 January 2017 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail
nlj_7730_aamodt_

Athelstane Aamodt provides a media law update

  • ​Ofcom announces its intention to end its “major parties” list; broadcasters given more freedom.

  • Wade v British Sky Broadcasting Limited : The Court of Appeal deals with the rare instance of a television format case.

Ofcom (the Office of Communications, ie the media regulator in the UK) has published a consultation paper (10 November 2016) that makes two important proposals:

i. Larger parties

Ofcom’s list of larger political parties varies depending on which part of the UK one is considering, but very broadly the Ofcom list includes the Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats, UKIP, and the SNP, and these parties must be given “due weight”. Ofcom is proposing to cease using the large party definition and to give broadcasters editorial freedom to use their own information and judgment on this issue. To understand why this will matter, it is necessary to look at the rules governing political advertising.

In the UK wall-to-wall political advertising on television and radio is (mercifully) prohibited. Sections 319(2)(g) and 321(2) of the Communications

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll