header-logo header-logo

Broadcast news

20 January 2017 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail
nlj_7730_aamodt_

Athelstane Aamodt provides a media law update

  • ​Ofcom announces its intention to end its “major parties” list; broadcasters given more freedom.

  • Wade v British Sky Broadcasting Limited : The Court of Appeal deals with the rare instance of a television format case.

Ofcom (the Office of Communications, ie the media regulator in the UK) has published a consultation paper (10 November 2016) that makes two important proposals:

i. Larger parties

Ofcom’s list of larger political parties varies depending on which part of the UK one is considering, but very broadly the Ofcom list includes the Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats, UKIP, and the SNP, and these parties must be given “due weight”. Ofcom is proposing to cease using the large party definition and to give broadcasters editorial freedom to use their own information and judgment on this issue. To understand why this will matter, it is necessary to look at the rules governing political advertising.

In the UK wall-to-wall political advertising on television and radio is (mercifully) prohibited. Sections 319(2)(g) and 321(2) of the Communications

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll