header-logo header-logo

26 March 2010
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Budget 2010: Tax avoidance, Stamp duty & Cider

A boost for the property sector, a four-year freeze on the inheritance tax threshold and a clampdown on tax avoidance were announced this week in what could be Chancellor Alistair Darling’s last budget.

Stamp duty is scrapped for first-time buyers purchasing homes up to £250,000 for the next two years, but increased to 5% on residential sales worth more than £1m from April 2011.

Karen Campbell, head of stamp taxes at Grant Thornton, says the relief could be exploited unless a clear definition of "first-time buyer" is found. “I suspect that this change will immediately fall into difficulty as there is little clarity in how to establish if a person is a first time buyer which could potentially encourage abuse,” she says.

“For example, there is currently scope for a couple that co-habit to assign the ownership of a new house to the partner who is a first time buyer, consequently avoiding SDLT.”

Capital gains tax remains at 18%, while relief for entrepreneurs will double. Business rate cuts are to be introduced in October for 500,000 companies, and small firms’ investment allowance will double to £100,000.

There will be no change to income tax or VAT. The Treasury expects to raise £500m by tightening the rules on tax avoidance. Penalties for undeclared offshore assets are to rise 200% where there is no agreement from the country holding the bank account or assets to disclose them to HMRC.

"These eye watering fines for taxpayers who hold bank accounts offshore which have not been declared to the UK taxman could ultimately lead to certain individuals paying the Revenue more than they had in the undeclared account in the first place,” says Heather Taylor, tax investigations specialist at Grant Thornton.

There will be new tax information exchange agreements with Belize, Grenada and Dominica. These will limit penalties for undeclared assets to 100%.

Cider duty is to rise by 10% above inflation. Wine, beer and spirit duties will rise by 2%, with a further 2% rise planned in 2013.

Richard Mannion, national tax director, Smith & Williamson accountants, said: “Winners are first time buyers, small businesses, and successful entrepreneurs.

“The losers are essentially the evaders and avoiders, the wealthy and of course cider drinkers.”
 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll