header-logo header-logo

Budget 2017: Chancellor plays safe & avoids an omnishambles

09 March 2017 / Peter Vaines
Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Peter Vaines shares his views on Phillip Hammond’s first & last spring budget

This was Mr Hammonds first spring Budget (and also his last) and he lived up to his “spreadsheet” reputation by providing endless lists of forecasts, figures and statistics so that 20 minutes in, no matter how good they sounded, I had practically dropped off.

Mr Hammond’s figures were met with a rather stony-faced opposition who clearly did not appreciate the frequent references to the LAST Labour government. Mr Hammond was keen to make it clear that the UK would be the best place in the world to start and grow a business and the reductions to corporation tax enabling companies to pay the lowest corporation tax rate in the G7 were clearly something to be welcomed. Unless you were planning to set up a company to do business and take advantage of the low tax rate. He was equally clear that setting up companies to do business is a BAD THING needing to be discouraged—indeed tax

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll