header-logo header-logo

Budget 2017: Chancellor plays safe & avoids an omnishambles

09 March 2017 / Peter Vaines
Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Peter Vaines shares his views on Phillip Hammond’s first & last spring budget

This was Mr Hammonds first spring Budget (and also his last) and he lived up to his “spreadsheet” reputation by providing endless lists of forecasts, figures and statistics so that 20 minutes in, no matter how good they sounded, I had practically dropped off.

Mr Hammond’s figures were met with a rather stony-faced opposition who clearly did not appreciate the frequent references to the LAST Labour government. Mr Hammond was keen to make it clear that the UK would be the best place in the world to start and grow a business and the reductions to corporation tax enabling companies to pay the lowest corporation tax rate in the G7 were clearly something to be welcomed. Unless you were planning to set up a company to do business and take advantage of the low tax rate. He was equally clear that setting up companies to do business is a BAD THING needing to be discouraged—indeed tax

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
back-to-top-scroll