header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Building contract

Genesis Housing Association Ltd v Liberty Syndicate Management Ltd [2012] EWHC 3105 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 150 (Nov)

It was well established that, in principle, “basis of contract” clauses and warranties in relation to insurance were enforceable in law and not contrary to law or public policy. The enforceability would generally come about either by such clauses or warranties being incorporated within the contract of insurance or as a stand-alone warranty by the insured given to the insurer through the proposal form or other document in which the “basis of contract” expression or declaration was given. If the insured had innocently or otherwise signed a document, usually the proposal, as the basis of the insurance contract entered or to be entered into, which confirmed (either to the best of the insured’s knowledge or belief or absolutely) as true the contents of that document, the insurance contract would be void or unenforceable if the contents were untrue. The contract of insurance, whether contained in the policy itself or any other documents such as the quotation or a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll