header-logo header-logo

07 July 2021
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-detail

Business & human rights

A global team of more than 60 Debevoise & Plimpton lawyers has authored a landmark report, the ‘UN guiding principles on business and human rights at 10’ (UNGPs)

The UNGPs consist of 31 principles setting out the duties and responsibilities of governments and business enterprises to prevent and address adverse impacts on people resulting from business activities.

The 264-page report, commissioned by the UN, marks ten years since the adoption of the UNGPs in 2011. It examines how judicial and quasi-judicial bodies in more than 50 jurisdictions have used and referred to the UNGPs in reaching their decisions.

It identifies regional and international trends and predicts how the use of the UNGPs might evolve in future. While there were few direct references to the UNGPs in judicial and quasi-judicial decisions, the researchers thought this was likely to change. Some recent legislation, such as the EU Taxonomy Regulation of March 2021, makes explicit reference to the UNGPs, while other legislation, such as the Modern Slavery Act 2015, refers to them as part of their rationale.

The researchers also report an increasing number of complaints in which the UNGPs have been cited by the parties, including in the English, US and Canadian courts.

Other observations include that the UNGPs are increasingly being incorporated into investment treaties and may come to play a more important role in international arbitration. One noticeable trend is towards dedicated business and human rights arbitration instruments and procedures, for example, the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, a first of its kind agreement between retailers and trade unions following the 2013 Rana Plaza building collapse. This Accord covers more than 1,600 factories and two million workers in Bangladesh and is, the report notes, ‘the first example of an arbitration procedure being integrated into an international framework to resolve business and human rights disputes’.

Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll