header-logo header-logo

07 July 2021
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-detail

Business & human rights

A global team of more than 60 Debevoise & Plimpton lawyers has authored a landmark report, the ‘UN guiding principles on business and human rights at 10’ (UNGPs)

The UNGPs consist of 31 principles setting out the duties and responsibilities of governments and business enterprises to prevent and address adverse impacts on people resulting from business activities.

The 264-page report, commissioned by the UN, marks ten years since the adoption of the UNGPs in 2011. It examines how judicial and quasi-judicial bodies in more than 50 jurisdictions have used and referred to the UNGPs in reaching their decisions.

It identifies regional and international trends and predicts how the use of the UNGPs might evolve in future. While there were few direct references to the UNGPs in judicial and quasi-judicial decisions, the researchers thought this was likely to change. Some recent legislation, such as the EU Taxonomy Regulation of March 2021, makes explicit reference to the UNGPs, while other legislation, such as the Modern Slavery Act 2015, refers to them as part of their rationale.

The researchers also report an increasing number of complaints in which the UNGPs have been cited by the parties, including in the English, US and Canadian courts.

Other observations include that the UNGPs are increasingly being incorporated into investment treaties and may come to play a more important role in international arbitration. One noticeable trend is towards dedicated business and human rights arbitration instruments and procedures, for example, the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, a first of its kind agreement between retailers and trade unions following the 2013 Rana Plaza building collapse. This Accord covers more than 1,600 factories and two million workers in Bangladesh and is, the report notes, ‘the first example of an arbitration procedure being integrated into an international framework to resolve business and human rights disputes’.

Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll