header-logo header-logo

Business in the digital age

226823
How is tech changing the way companies do business, & how can the law keep pace? By Piers Larbey & Izabella Brooks
  • From virtual AGMs and e-signatures to AI-assisted governance, technology is redefining how companies operate and comply with legal frameworks.
  • While legislation supports digital practices, gaps remain, especially around AI use, virtual meeting validity, and directors’ duties to exercise independent judgment.

Since 2016, when Jimmy Choo held the first virtual annual general meeting (AGM) of a UK-listed company, a flood of public limited companies has followed suit, including AstraZeneca, Marks & Spencer, Nationwide Building Society, BAE Systems and Aston Martin Lagonda. Virtual AGMs have proved to be contentious and controversial. Whether they constitute a valid shareholder meeting under the UK’s current legal framework remains a matter of debate.

The provisions governing shareholder meetings are contained in the relevant sections of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Section 311(1) of CA 2006 requires notice of a meeting to state the time, date and place of

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll