header-logo header-logo

Call for extension of stamp duty holiday

24 February 2021
Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail
Stamp duty holiday end ‘bigger than COVID-19 or Brexit’ for property sector

Lawyers have called for urgent action to stop tens of thousands of property transactions collapsing at the end of the stamp duty holiday.

The stamp duty land tax holiday is due to end on 31 March. Many people who rushed to take advantage of the opportunity are now waiting nervously to see whether their transactions will go through in time. Those in a chain are particularly vulnerable.

According to homebuyer website Rightmove’s House Price Index January 2021, the average time to complete is more than four months, and about 100,000 buyers could miss out on the stamp duty saving.

The Law Society is urging its members to write to their MP requesting action to protect consumers ahead of the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s budget on 3 March.

Law Society president, David Greene, said the ‘abrupt end’ of the holiday ‘combined with a bottleneck in the market could cause significant disruption.

‘Thousands of transactions and chains could collapse at the last minute, leaving consumers who had hoped to take advantage of the concession to move into their dream home instead stranded and saddled with unrecoverable costs for transactions that fell through. Urgent action needs to be taken to soften this cliff edge and protect homebuyers and sellers from being out of the scheme, out of luck and out of pocket.’

It suggested three courses of action―extending the holiday, to give buyers more time to complete; tapering the end of the holiday so buyers can benefit from a reduced concession, to smooth the cliff edge; and introducing a grandfathering scheme where sales that have reached a certain stage by the deadline but not completed can still benefit from the holiday.

The level of anxiety among residential conveyancers and other property professionals was revealed in a survey of 600 by conveyancing search and software companies tmgroup and mio. The results, published this month in the report, ‘Thriving in a pandemic’, found conveyancers struggling with the pressure of work. The majority agreed the verdict on whether to grant a holiday extension would have a bigger impact on their role this year than either COVID-19 or Brexit.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll