header-logo header-logo

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Calls for shake-up of family justice system

Children can wait “well over a year” for the family justice system to determine their future, an independent review panel has found.

An interim report by the Family Justice Review Panel found that too many private law disputes are ending up in court, that caseloads are rising and that there is little joint planning between the different organisations.

The panel’s chair, David Norgrove said, in his introduction: “There is distrust, with now a vicious circle of layers of checking and scrutiny that lead to work being done less well in the first place.There are few means of mutual learning and feedback. The lack of IT and management information is astonishing.”

The panel’s interim recommendations were to set up a Family Justice Service headed by a national Family Justice Board that would draw the function of agencies together, while local Family Justice Boards replaced the existing “plethora of arrangements”. It called for specialist judges to hear cases from start to finish, and for court social work services to form part of the Family Justice Service, subsuming the role of Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service.

It recommended less reliance on unnecessary expert reports when these are not in the best interests of the child; that a bespoke timetable be established for each child’s situation to minimise the damage caused by uncertainty; and that separating couples with children be assessed for mediation and given information on the impact of conflict on the children.
It also recommended that parenting agreements be drafted to set out contact arrangements for grandparents.

Stuart Ruff, solicitor at Thomas Eggar, said: “Grandparents are often forgotten in any separation and a huge number of grandparents lose contact with their grandchildren.”

Issue: 7460 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll