header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 November 2024 / Jeremy Clarke-Williams
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Features , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Can a trade union sue for defamation?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
This long-disputed question finally has an answer, writes Jeremy Clarke-Williams
  • Examines the legislation and case law that have affected the right of trade unions to sue for defamation, in particular relating to whether they are considered ‘quasi corporations’.
  • Sets out the facts of Prospect v Evans, which gave welcome clarity on the matter, ruling that trade unions can indeed bring a claim.

Whether a trade union has the capacity to sue for the tort of defamation has been a matter of some uncertainty for many years. Until 1971, unions were treated as ‘quasi corporations’, and this was regarded by the courts as bestowing sufficient legal personality to sue for defamation.

However, in Electrical Electronic Telecommunication and Plumbing Union v Times Newspapers Ltd [1980] QB 585, [1980] 1 All ER 1097 (EETPU), the union’s libel action was dismissed when it was held that the provision in s 2(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974 (TULRA 1974) which stipulated that: ‘A trade union… shall

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: 40 years on, has PACE lost its edge?
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
NLJ this week: Stress-testing the City
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
NLJ this week: Mandelson, Epstein & the court of popular opinion
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll