header-logo header-logo

04 August 2025
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Legal News , Consumer , Financial services litigation , Commercial , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Car dealership ruling not end of road

The Supreme Court’s decision on car dealership commission may have saved the banks but it still leaves the door ‘ajar’ for further claims, lawyers have said

Overturning the Court of Appeal’s decision last week, five justices held car dealers charging commission on loans did not owe fiduciary duties to customers as they were pursuing their ‘own commercial interests, free of any undertaking, express or implied, to act selflessly in the finding and negotiation of a finance package’.

The landmark decision, in Johnson and others v Firstrand Bank and others [2025] UKSC 33, immediately dashed claim managers’ hopes of a £44bn pay-out bonanza from lenders. In one of the three cases only, Johnson, the court ordered the lender to repay the commission with interest on the basis the relationship was unfair.

NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan, of City Law School, said: ‘What struck me was the way in which the court was so keen to support commerce and the right to make a living/ profit.

‘At para [110] the conventional commercial transaction is sensibly upheld. Businesses need to make a profit. There was nothing untoward save in Johnson where there was palpable unfairness.’

According to Browne Jacobson partner Helen Simm, however, ‘the sting could still be in the tail.

‘The court upheld Mr Johnson’s claim under s 140 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) due to a 55% commission, hidden commercial ties, and misleading paperwork. The clear message is that undisclosed, excessive commissions and deceptive sales tactics may still trigger findings of unfairness under CCA.

‘So while the headline claim has fallen away, the door remains very much ajar and many consumers may yet pursue claims on this narrower, but still potent, basis.’

Jeremy Irving, financial services partner at Browne Jacobson, agreed: ‘The failure to disclose a large commission can still be relevant when assessing the buyer’s or borrower’s rights under the CCA.

‘The court also confirmed that the intermediary’s financial interest, typically a commission, comes from the finance provider, not the buyer. This ruling could have implications for the insurance industry. It raises questions about whether insurance placements are comparable to these “three-cornered” structures, and whether there’s a shared understanding among insurers, policyholders, and the courts about who ultimately bears the cost of intermediary remuneration.

‘The market should also consider the claims ramifications from a potentially large volume of liabilities for car dealers in relation to CCA disputes.’

Guy Wilkes, partner at Mishcon de Reya, said: ‘We haven't seen the end of claims arising out of undisclosed commissions completely.’

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has confirmed it will consult by October on a compensation scheme with pay-outs beginning in 2026, but said most consumers would receive less than £950.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll