header-logo header-logo

21 February 2025 / Henry Warwick KC , Douglas Maxwell
Issue: 8105 / Categories: Features , Company , Consumer
printer mail-detail

Johnson v FirstRand Bank Limited

208717
Henry Warwick KC & Douglas Maxwell discuss the £30bn+ decision for the Supreme Court
  • An in-depth explanation of the decision of the Court of Appeal in Johnson, including the key issues to be considered by the Supreme Court.
  • Includes discussion of the potential impacts of the decision.

In 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) took measures to ban arrangements for the payment of commissions using so-called ‘discretionary difference in charges’ (or ‘DiC’) models. These had been used by lenders to incentivise car dealers to offer motor finance to customers at rates of interest set or negotiated by the dealer, where dealers would earn higher commission for negotiating higher rates. The FCA did not ban other fixed commission models, which remain in use today. Generally, a lender need only disclose the amount of a commission it pays if it is asked to. But notwithstanding the ban, in the words of a well-known circuit judge, the County Court has ‘seen explosive growth in the last few years’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll