header-logo header-logo

21 February 2025 / Henry Warwick KC , Douglas Maxwell
Issue: 8105 / Categories: Features , Company , Consumer
printer mail-detail

Johnson v FirstRand Bank Limited

208717
Henry Warwick KC & Douglas Maxwell discuss the £30bn+ decision for the Supreme Court
  • An in-depth explanation of the decision of the Court of Appeal in Johnson, including the key issues to be considered by the Supreme Court.
  • Includes discussion of the potential impacts of the decision.

In 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) took measures to ban arrangements for the payment of commissions using so-called ‘discretionary difference in charges’ (or ‘DiC’) models. These had been used by lenders to incentivise car dealers to offer motor finance to customers at rates of interest set or negotiated by the dealer, where dealers would earn higher commission for negotiating higher rates. The FCA did not ban other fixed commission models, which remain in use today. Generally, a lender need only disclose the amount of a commission it pays if it is asked to. But notwithstanding the ban, in the words of a well-known circuit judge, the County Court has ‘seen explosive growth in the last few years’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll