header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009 / Clare Mcconnell
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Careering ahead

The Legal Services Act 2007 is a force for good for women solicitors, says Clare McConnell

The Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) has brought about a full-blooded revolution in legal services regulation. It is, in the words of the Legal Services Board (LSB), the new overarching professional regulator, to whom The Law Society and the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA), its regulatory arm is responsible, “a milestone in legal regulation”. But what does this milestone promise for women solicitors?

The new regulatory landscape

The first thing to say is that the changes promise a more rigorous regulatory approach to ensuring that the profession becomes more diverse at all levels, rather than simply at entry level which has been the primary focus to date.

The LSB is placed under an express obligation (LSA 2007, s 3) to act in a way, so far as reasonably practicable, with the regulatory objectives set out in LSA 2007, s 1. These regulatory objectives are: protecting and promoting the public interest; supporting the constitutional principle of the rule of law;
improving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll