header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009 / Clare Mcconnell
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Careering ahead

The Legal Services Act 2007 is a force for good for women solicitors, says Clare McConnell

The Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) has brought about a full-blooded revolution in legal services regulation. It is, in the words of the Legal Services Board (LSB), the new overarching professional regulator, to whom The Law Society and the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA), its regulatory arm is responsible, “a milestone in legal regulation”. But what does this milestone promise for women solicitors?

The new regulatory landscape

The first thing to say is that the changes promise a more rigorous regulatory approach to ensuring that the profession becomes more diverse at all levels, rather than simply at entry level which has been the primary focus to date.

The LSB is placed under an express obligation (LSA 2007, s 3) to act in a way, so far as reasonably practicable, with the regulatory objectives set out in LSA 2007, s 1. These regulatory objectives are: protecting and promoting the public interest; supporting the constitutional principle of the rule of law;
improving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll