header-logo header-logo

07 September 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Carpmaels & Ransford—Agathe Michel-de Cazotte

Law firm appoints European litigator as partner

Carpmaels & Ransford has recently announced the arrival of Agathe Michel-de Cazotte as a Partner at the firm, effective from 1st September 2022.

Agathe (pictured) is an experienced European litigator with a particular interest in the Unified Patent Court (UPC), and has many years of experience in advising clients on how to make the most of this new system for pan-European patent litigation. She joins Carpmaels from Hogan Lovells.

Agathe has represented clients in major cross-border patent litigations in France, the UK, Germany, and in EPO oppositions for over a decade, and joins Carpmaels’ Dispute Resolution group ahead of the imminent arrival of the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Her practice has a strong focus on pharma, chemistry, and she has extensive experience defending telecom innovators in SEP (including FRAND issues) and NEP litigation, as well as pharma clients in blockbuster formulation, method of treatment and second medical use patents. Her time spent in-house with major blue-chip companies has given her a sound understanding of the technological and business drivers behind agreements and litigation related decisions.

As the industry gears up for the UPC, Agathe’s first-hand knowledge of the varied legal traditions across Europe will be invaluable. She has represented clients before the various infringement courts in Germany, the German Federal Patent Court, the German Federal Court of Justice (all instances), the French Civil Courts, the UK High Court, the IPEC, the European Patent Office and both the French and German Patent and Trademark Offices.

Hugh Goodfellow, Managing Partner, commented: 'Agathe’s wealth of experience in pan-European patent litigation, for both major multinationals and innovative SMEs, makes her a great asset to Carpmaels. Her extensive knowledge and advisory work in relation to the soon-to-be-launched UPC will be particularly vital in the run-up to the opening of that court, and the cases for our clients that will inevitably follow.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll