header-logo header-logo

22 June 2011
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Cartels blow whistle to reduce fines

The number of business cartels signing up to the Office of Fair Trading’s (OFT) leniency programme nearly doubled last year.

In 2010, the OFT accepted every one of the 25 leniency applications it received, compared with 13 of the 15 applications it received in 2009, according to Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (RPC), who obtained the information through a Freedom of Information Act request. The programme offers businesses involved in cartel behaviour an opportunity to secure 100% immunity from fines and prosecution in return for voluntarily providing the OFT with evidence of the cartel.

It was used recently by Barclays, which received 100% discount on its fine for cartel behaviour relating to the pricing of loan products for professional services firms, and by a number of construction companies involved in a major bid-rigging case who received reduced fines for their co-operation.

Stephen Smith, partner at RPC, said: “Cartel behaviour is notoriously difficult to detect. The leniency programme is an important policy tool in the OFT’s enforcement toolkit, enabling the OFT to obtain substantial evidence from businesses prepared to blow the whistle in exchange for a reduced penalty. Plea bargaining style deals are controversial, particularly where the evidence provided may be used subsequently in individual criminal prosecutions, but the tactic certainly seems to be working.”

Smith said there have been concerns among competition lawyers over government proposals to merge the OFT and the Competition Commission.

“The UK competition regime is generally well regarded by business and the legal community alike. There is therefore some concern, particularly in respect of a number of the government’s proposals, that what is perceived as a very effective system could be torn up.”

Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
back-to-top-scroll