header-logo header-logo

22 June 2011
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Cartels blow whistle to reduce fines

The number of business cartels signing up to the Office of Fair Trading’s (OFT) leniency programme nearly doubled last year.

In 2010, the OFT accepted every one of the 25 leniency applications it received, compared with 13 of the 15 applications it received in 2009, according to Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (RPC), who obtained the information through a Freedom of Information Act request. The programme offers businesses involved in cartel behaviour an opportunity to secure 100% immunity from fines and prosecution in return for voluntarily providing the OFT with evidence of the cartel.

It was used recently by Barclays, which received 100% discount on its fine for cartel behaviour relating to the pricing of loan products for professional services firms, and by a number of construction companies involved in a major bid-rigging case who received reduced fines for their co-operation.

Stephen Smith, partner at RPC, said: “Cartel behaviour is notoriously difficult to detect. The leniency programme is an important policy tool in the OFT’s enforcement toolkit, enabling the OFT to obtain substantial evidence from businesses prepared to blow the whistle in exchange for a reduced penalty. Plea bargaining style deals are controversial, particularly where the evidence provided may be used subsequently in individual criminal prosecutions, but the tactic certainly seems to be working.”

Smith said there have been concerns among competition lawyers over government proposals to merge the OFT and the Competition Commission.

“The UK competition regime is generally well regarded by business and the legal community alike. There is therefore some concern, particularly in respect of a number of the government’s proposals, that what is perceived as a very effective system could be torn up.”

Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll