header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Causes for thought

commentsmith

Roger Smith provides an overview of the latest human rights news

Gray’s Inn proved a curiously appropriate venue for a Brick Court discussion of whether the common law should break free of Europe. The ghost of the great Professor Dicey might have walked through the wood-panelled walls and joined in the debate. Michael Howe QC would certainly have welcomed his intervention in defence of the challenge of human rights to Parliamentary Sovereignty. The rest of the panel might have prayed him in aid—if he had kept up to date—as an analytical lawyer on the question of whether Mr Howe had correctly understood the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.

The participants had been selected more as representatives for various views rather than in the hope of a constructive debate. Dominic Grieve QC MP was, as usual, sensible. Lord Judge persisted with his disingenuous claim that he just wanted clarity on the role of Parliament and the European Court of Human Rights and had no view on what it should be. Isabella

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll