header-logo header-logo

07 March 2019 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Challenging the balance of power

In the first part of a series of three articles, Simon Parsons investigates judicial review of executive action

  • Challenging the power of public bodies.
  • Judicial review as a remedy of last resort.
  • Principles of English public law.
  • Procedural matters.
  • Decisions of public bodies can be challenged by way of judicial review and may be quashed as ultra vires (beyond its powers). Following the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) into domestic law many judicial reviews concern the abuse of Convention rights.

    When determining whether governmental action is legal and valid, the administrative court is exercising what is known as an inherent jurisdiction, ie it derives from the common law and not from statute. The judges are very quick to resist any attempts to curtail this jurisdiction because it gives effect to the underlying values of judicial review that is the rule of law and the separation of powers. The rule of law requires that those who exercise governmental power comply with minimum standards of good

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

    NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

    Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

    Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

    Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

    Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

    Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

    Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

    Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

    NEWS
    Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
    The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
    Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
    Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
    The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
    back-to-top-scroll