header-logo header-logo

Change of approach for computer program patents

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , Other practice areas , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Patents

Some computer programs can be patented, the High Court has ruled. The decision in Astron Clinica Ltd and others v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks has prompted the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) to change its approach to patents for computer programs.

I t says it will not appeal against Mr Justice Kitchin’s ruling that patents should be allowed to protect a computer program if the program implements a patentable invention.

The law on patentable subject matter in the field of computer-implemented inventions was substantially reinterpreted by the Court of Appeal in 2006, in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd and others; Re Macrossan’s Application. Followingthat judgment, UK-IPO concluded that claims to computer programs or to programs on a carrier were not allowable.

However, in Astron, a group of patent applicants successfully argued that if their computer-implemented methods and apparatus were patentable, they should also be able to protect the underlying computer programs themselves. Kitchin J said: “I do not detect anything in the reasoning of the Court of Appeal which suggests that all computer programs are necessarily excluded.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
David Lammy, Ellie Reeves and Baroness Levitt have taken up office at the Ministry of Justice, following the cabinet reshuffle
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
back-to-top-scroll