header-logo header-logo

A change of heart

15 January 2016 / Bianca Venkata
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
nlj_7682_venkata

Bianca Venkata heralds the coming into force of the new senior management regime

On 7 March 2016 the new senior management regime (the regime) will come into force. The regime introduces three key requirements which aim to hold senior managers to account. On 15 October 2015 HM Treasury announced that it was removing the controversial “reverse burden of proof” from the regime. This is despite the fact that the reverse burden of proof was strongly recommended by the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (PCBS) and supported by the government, Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

This article considers three key requirements of the regime and the impact of the removal of the reverse burden of proof.

Background

The financial crisis in 2008 fundamentally changed the perception of the financial sector. The global credit crunch resulted in the near collapse of the banking system. The government invested £37bn to bail out Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds TSB, and HBOS. In December 2008, the FTSE 100 closed down by 31.3%, the biggest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll