header-logo header-logo

30 June 2017 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Charitable house sales

nlj_7752_walsh

What do recent planning changes mean for non-exempt charitable housing associations? Bethan Walsh looks at the law

  • As of 6 April 2017, non-exempt charitable housing associations need to comply with ss 117-121 of the Charities Act 2011 when they dispose of land.

Recent changes made by the Housing and Planning Act 2016 (HPA 2016) have affected the extent to which registered providers of social housing (RPs) are required to comply with Pt 7 of the Charities Act 2011 (ChA 2011) with regard to disposals of land and mortgages. These changes came into effect as of 6 April 2017.

Background

Section 171(1) of the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 (HRA 2008) provided a general power for an RP to dispose of land. Where such land was a dwelling that was social housing, RPs were required to obtain consent from the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) under s 172 of the HRA 2008 or from the Welsh Ministers under s 133 of the Housing Act 1988 in relation to land in Wales.

The disposal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll