header-logo header-logo

Charity partnerships: birds of a feather

27 June 2019 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Charities should be aware of the risks as well as the benefits when partnering with non-charities, says Bethan Walsh

  • Charities working with non-charities: the Charity Commission’s new guidance.

Working with non-charitable organisations or ‘non-charities’ can offer charities great benefits—for example, fundraising and profile-raising, to name just a couple of the more obvious benefits. But charities have to deal with the fact that this strategy also carries a number of risks, including reputation and loss of income. For example, if the non-charity is reflected poorly in the media for whatever reason, that could result in reputational issues for the charity.

Following last year’s consultation on the draft guidance, the Charity Commission has published its long-anticipated new guidance on ‘Charities with a connection to a non-charity’. The guidance sets out the Commission’s expectations for managing relationships where charities are connected to non-charities. A key motive behind the guidance is to address concerns that some links between charities and non-charities have damaged public trust and confidence in charity generally.

While the focus

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll