header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Helen Hart
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Community care
printer mail-detail

Checking up

Are Criminal Records Bureau checks too onerous? asks Helen Hart

Anyone wishing to work with children or vulnerable adults is required to undergo a Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) check to ensure they have not been involved in any activity which could mean that they constitute a danger to children. This does not just involve those wishing to undertake paid work, such as working in a school, but also volunteers, such as scout leaders, who are required to submit to a disclosure exercise. The number of adults who must undergo CRB checks on their suitability to work with children in schools and other institutions runs into several million. Given the scale of this operation, it is inevitable that mistakes will occasionally be made.

DISCLOSURE

The CRB is based in Liverpool and was established in March 2002 under Pt V of the Police Act 1997. It is run as a public-private partnership with Capita. It currently obtains records via the Police National Computer of the local police forces, as well as Scottish police records

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll