header-logo header-logo

13 January 2012 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Features , Child law , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Child benefit

Michael Tringham examines the law relating to inheritance by children

A double intestacy has brought the sole beneficiary’s mother—the co-habiting partner of the deceased’s three-year-old son Rory—into the High Court as both claimant and defendant (as her son’s litigation friend). The case started with Rory’s grandfather, who died intestate in 2009. His £500,000 estate passed to his son Kieran (Rory’s father), who died seven months later, also intestate.

While Rory’s mother Ellen “nobly”, said Mr Justice Norris (Wright & Greenstreet v Gater & Wright [2011] EWHC 2881 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 153 (Nov)), made no claim on her late partner’s estate, two consequences of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (s 47) gave her cause for concern:

  • A potential £89,000 inheritance tax bill.
  • Anxiety should her son receive all the money at his 18th birthday—or if he married or formed a civil partnership before then.

She and her late partner’s brother (Rory’s uncle) sought a variation under which they and a solicitor would hold the estate upon trust for Rory until he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll