header-logo header-logo

Child benefit

13 January 2012 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Features , Child law , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Michael Tringham examines the law relating to inheritance by children

A double intestacy has brought the sole beneficiary’s mother—the co-habiting partner of the deceased’s three-year-old son Rory—into the High Court as both claimant and defendant (as her son’s litigation friend). The case started with Rory’s grandfather, who died intestate in 2009. His £500,000 estate passed to his son Kieran (Rory’s father), who died seven months later, also intestate.

While Rory’s mother Ellen “nobly”, said Mr Justice Norris (Wright & Greenstreet v Gater & Wright [2011] EWHC 2881 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 153 (Nov)), made no claim on her late partner’s estate, two consequences of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (s 47) gave her cause for concern:

  • A potential £89,000 inheritance tax bill.
  • Anxiety should her son receive all the money at his 18th birthday—or if he married or formed a civil partnership before then.

She and her late partner’s brother (Rory’s uncle) sought a variation under which they and a solicitor would hold the estate upon trust for Rory until he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll