header-logo header-logo

01 June 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Family
printer mail-detail

Child protection

nlj_7795_burrows

David Burrows discusses the loss of the EU Charter & the potential impact on children

  • How much of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights will remain part of the common law for children?
  • The Ministry of Justice needs to clarify the law before exit day, for the sake of children.

The European Union (Withdrawal) Bill left the Commons on 17 January 2018 with cl 5(4) intact. That clause insouciantly says: ‘(4) The Charter of Fundamental Rights is not part of domestic law on or after exit day’, by which it means the EU Charter (2000/C 364/01). For English law purposes the Charter will disappear (unless the Lords revives it and the Commons relent); and if so how far will what it says remain part of the common law for children?

Disappearance of the Charter only matters, in law, if a case is decided under EU law. Thus, Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 Concerning Jurisdiction… in Matters of Parental Responsibility (Brussels IIA) was picked out for special mention by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll