header-logo header-logo

Children—Abduction—Removal outside jurisdiction

23 March 2012
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re S (a child) (international abduction: subjective fear of risk) [2012] UKSC 10, [2012] All ER (D) 106 (Mar)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson SCJJ, 14 Mar 2012

In considering a defence under the Hague Convention (the Convention) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 Art 13(b), if the court concludes that, on return to the place of habitual residence, the mother will suffer such anxieties that their effect on her mental health will create a situation that is intolerable for the child, then the child should not be returned.

James Turner QC and Geraldine More O’Ferrall (instructed by Rosleys Solicitors) for the mother. Anthony Kirk QC and Nicholas Anderson (instructed by Lyons Davidson) for the father. Henry Setright QC and Edward Devereux (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) for the intervener.

The appellant mother was British with Australian citizenship. The respondent father was Australian. W was the two-year-old son of the parties. The mother and father lived with W in Sydney

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll