header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Children & money

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
06 July 2012
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Where the parties are involved in both divorce financial remedies and Children Act 1989 proceedings...

Where the parties are involved in both divorce financial remedies and Children Act 1989 proceedings (the latter involving live Cafcass evidence) and what residence order is made will affect housing needs, is there any reason why the two cases should not be tried together?

Children first (where child welfare is paramount): financial remedies (where it is the first consideration) second. However, it may be desirable for the second to follow on from the first and be heard by the same judge unless it would be more proportionate for the parties to have the benefit of an FDR before final hearing of financial remedies after the child dispute has been resolved.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: AI, liberty & the digital cage
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform in limbo
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Enforcement reform gets real
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
NLJ this week: Standish reshapes family & inheritance claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
NLJ this week: Clearing Christine Keeler’s name
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll